Circle: Not Every Company Can Issue a Stablecoin
Original Article Title: The Stablecoin Trap: Issuing a Stablecoin Without the Infrastructure to Run One
Original Author: Kash Razzaghi, Circle
Translation: Peggy, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: With regulatory clarity and institutional entry, stablecoins are evolving from a technical tool into critical financial infrastructure. This article points out that issuing a stablecoin is not a simple technical choice but a long-term strategic decision involving trust, liquidity, and compliance capabilities. Most projects falter before achieving scale, naturally converging the market around a few mature networks. For most businesses, the real question is not "whether to issue a coin" but "how to effectively use a stablecoin to create growth opportunities for the business."
Below is the original article:
Over the past few months, I have repeatedly engaged in a familiar type of conversation with executives of some of the world's largest companies. They have shown a strong interest in stablecoins that enable near-instantaneous, cross-border transfer, such as digital dollars and euros like USDC and EURC. Many of them are also pondering: Should we issue our own stablecoin?
This impulse is understandable. This market has already reached a significant scale with sustained growth momentum. In 2025, the total market value of stablecoins increased from around $205 billion on January 1, 2025, to over $300 billion by December 31, 2025. USDC issued by Circle remains one of the core assets in this category, closing the year-end of 2025 with a market cap exceeding $75 billion.
But before truly entering the space, every business should first ask itself a question: Do you simply want to use a stablecoin for your business, or do you intend to genuinely engage in the "stablecoin issuance" business?
This is not a technical issue but a strategic one: Does issuing currency belong to the core of your business model?
Relatively speaking, creating a stablecoin on the blockchain is actually the easiest part. Essentially, it is merely a software engineering practice: to write and deploy a blockchain-based token contract. As long as there is an engineering team, or in some cases, with the help of white-label partners, a token can go live in a relatively short amount of time. However, once the product is operational, stablecoin operation means supporting a 24/7 financial infrastructure.
To operate a trusted, regulated stablecoin that can meet the expectations of institutions, regulators, and millions of users, real-time reserve management across different market cycles is necessary. This includes daily reconciliation with multiple banking partners, independent audits, and compliance and regulatory reporting across multiple jurisdictions. This requires building a round-the-clock compliance, risk management, fund management, and liquidity operation system with clear upgrade and contingency mechanisms under pressure scenarios with zero tolerance for errors. These capabilities are by no means something that can be "outsourced once and then ignored"; as scale grows, they continuously accumulate, amplify in cost, complexity, and reputational risk.
From a systemic perspective, each new closed-loop stablecoin further fragments liquidity and trust. Each issuer is duplicating efforts to build reserves, compliance systems, and redemption channels, weakening the stablecoin's overall depth and resilience in times of stress. In contrast, integrating with USDC from day one combines liquidity, standards, and operational capabilities into a widely adopted unified network.
For corporate executives evaluating this decision, the operational differences between these two paths become particularly clear:

The Temptation of Shortcuts
Currently, from fintech companies, payment institutions to crypto projects, a large number of newcomers are exploring or directly launching their stablecoins. The growth of the stablecoin market in 2025 reflects both a gradually clearer regulatory environment and rising institutional interest. However, despite hundreds of stablecoin projects being launched, about 95% have never truly achieved persistent, global scale.
Some believe they can replicate the same economic returns without bearing heavy operational costs. The reality is not so romantic. Whether issuing on their own or through white-label services, you enter an industry where trust, liquidity, and scale are a matter of life and death.
Sometimes, the cost of mistakes is even measured in the "trillions." According to media reports earlier this year, a certain issuer accidentally minted $300 trillion in tokens due to an operational error. Although it was fixed within minutes, it was enough to make headlines. In another instance, a well-known stablecoin briefly depegged during a market volatility, once again illustrating that even small infrastructure flaws can be magnified and cascaded under pressure.
These events remind us that the ability of a stablecoin to hold its ground depends on operational rigor under high-pressure environments. Both the market and policymakers are closely watching.
Trust is the True Network Effect
Anyone can create a token on the blockchain. In fact, there are already thousands—most minted in minutes and just as quickly forgotten. Even in the stablecoin sub-market, with over 300 projects launched, only a handful truly carry almost all real-world usage and value; while the vast majority, about 95%, have never truly succeeded.
The difference lies not in technology but in scale and trust. The real challenge of stablecoins begins during the expansion phase: how to sustain liquidity, redemption, compliance, and system availability as transaction volumes grow across markets and cycles.
You can mint a token in minutes, but you can't mint trust in minutes. Trust comes from transparency, scale, and cross-market cycle consistency in redemption, accruing over time. This is why the stablecoin market ultimately consolidates in the hands of a few issuers — and why as of January 30, 2026, USDC has settled over $600 trillion in historical volume.
Instead of Reinventing the Wheel, Choose to Collaborate
For most businesses, the right question is not "How do we issue our stablecoin?" but "How do we integrate a stablecoin into our business to unlock new growth?"
With USDC and EURC, businesses can embed digital dollars and euros today, gaining near-instant settlement, global coverage, and cross-chain interoperability across dozens of blockchains without dealing with the complexity of reserve management and regulatory compliance.
Co-Writing the Next Chapter
The stablecoin industry is entering a new phase. Policymakers are setting clearer rules, institutions are raising their standards, and the market is gradually converging on a simple consensus: trust, liquidity, and compliance are the true moats.
The goal is not to have more stablecoins but to have fewer but better stablecoins — capable of meeting current needs with shared liquidity, transparent reserves, and cross-cycle verified performance.
For institutions crafting a stablecoin strategy, the first step should not be deciding "what to mint" but deciding "who to mint with." If you want to leverage stablecoins for your business without becoming a stablecoin issuer, the enduring choice is clear: talk to Circle, use USDC.
You may also like

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds

See “Buy Walls” & “Sell Walls” Instantly: WEEX Launches the Depth Chart for Smarter Trades

What Is Quick Trade on WEEX? 2 Ways WEEX Ends Chart-Panel Jumping

Morning News | Five major virtual asset platforms in South Korea have experienced 57 incidents of hacking and system failures in six years; Grayscale submits registration application for Canton ETF

Should we escape the peak? The principle of the tail-end market in the stock market

RootData: May 2026 Cryptocurrency Exchange Transparency Research Report

Founder of Baixing.com: My Experience with Claude Code in Fourteen Points
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching
Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.
Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.
Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery
Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

