The Harsh Reality Behind the $26 Billion Crypto Liquidation: Liquidity Is Killing the Market
Original Article Title: There's Not Enough Money In The World
Original Article Author: @plur_daddy, Financial Analyst
Original Article Translation: Dangdang, Odaily Planet Daily
Editor's Note: Gold and silver plummeted, US stocks tumbled across the board, and the cryptocurrency market was hit hard with a 24-hour trading volume of over $26 billion. Bitcoin once experienced a flash crash to the $60,000 level, plunging nearly 20% in a single day. From its peak of $126,000 in October last year, the BTC price has been halved. What's even more alarming is that the market has seen almost no meaningful resistance.
Everyone is frantically searching for reasons: US tech stocks dragging down crypto, Trump's nomination of Warsh triggering hawkish expectations, a strong dollar, poor job data... These explanations all sound reasonable. However, in the view of the author of this article, they are mostly superficial and not the core issue. The real underlying reason is that there is simply not enough money in the world. The AI massive capital expenditure cycle itself is shifting from "injecting liquidity" to "extracting liquidity," leading to a substantial shortage of global financial capital.
The following content is from the original author and will systematically break down how this mechanism operates.
We are undergoing a paradigm shift in the market, driven by a financial capital shortage caused by the AI capital expenditure cycle. This has a profound impact on asset prices because capital has been excessively abundant for a long time. The Web 2.0 and SaaS paradigms that drove the market prosperity of the 2010s were essentially extremely light capital business models, allowing a large amount of surplus capital to flow into various speculative assets.
Yesterday, while discussing the market structure, I suddenly had an "epiphany moment." I believe this is the most differentiated article I have written in a long time. Below, I will break down layer by layer how everything functions.
There is actually a highly similar mechanism between AI capital expenditure and government fiscal stimulus, which helps us understand its underlying logic.
In fiscal stimulus, the government issues bonds, and the private sector then absorbs duration risk; the government then receives cash and injects it back into the economy. This cash circulates in the real economy, creating a multiplier effect. Its net impact on financial asset prices is positive precisely because of the existence of this multiplier effect.
When it comes to AI capital expenditure, mega-cap tech companies either issue bonds or sell government bonds (or other assets), with the private sector absorbing the duration risk; these companies then receive the cash and put it to use. This cash similarly circulates in the real economy, generating a multiplier effect. Ultimately, the net impact on financial asset prices remains positive.
As long as this funding comes from the “dry powder” in the economic system (idle capital not yet deployed), this process can run smoothly. It works well, almost able to “lift all boats.” In recent years, this has been the dominant paradigm—AI capital expenditure acting as an incremental stimulus, injecting a stimulant into the economy and markets.
The issue is: once the dry powder is depleted, any dollar inflows into AI capital expenditure must be diverted from elsewhere. This triggers a convexity scramble for capital. When capital becomes scarce, markets are forced to reevaluate: where is capital best deployed? Meanwhile, the cost of capital (i.e., interest rates set by the market) rises.
Let me reiterate: when money becomes tight, there is an “elimination game” among assets. The most speculative assets suffer disproportionately—just as they disproportionately benefited when capital was abundant but lacked productive use. In this sense, AI capital expenditure actually plays a role in “reverse QE,” leading to a negative asset allocation rebalancing effect.
Fiscal stimulus typically does not face this issue because the Fed often ends up being the ultimate absorber of duration risk, thereby avoiding “crowding out” effects for other capital purposes.
The term “money” used here can be interchangeable with “liquidity.” However, the word “liquidity” can be confusing as it has different meanings in different contexts.
Let me give you an example: money or liquidity is like water. You need the water level in the bathtub to be high enough for financial assets (those floating rubber ducks) to rise together. To do this, there are several ways:
· You can increase the total amount of water (rate cuts / QE)
· You can unclog the inflow pipes (similar to current operations like RRP (reverse repurchase) / RMP (reserve management purchases))
· Or you can reduce the rate at which water drains from the bathtub.
When discussing liquidity in the economy, the focus is almost always on the money supply. However, in reality, demand for money is equally important. The issue we currently face is: excessive demand, leading to a significant crowding-out effect.
There have been reports in the media that the world's "deepest pockets" — Saudi Arabia and SoftBank — have essentially been squeezed dry. Over the past decade, the world has been on a frenzy of asset gorging, and now it is "full." Let's take a closer look at what this means.
Suppose Sam Altman (Founder of OpenAI) reaches out to them to honor their previous commitments. Unlike in the past when they still had dry powder, now they must sell something first to free up money to give to him. So, hypothetically, what would they sell?
They would review their investment portfolio and select the least confident assets: sell some underperforming bitcoins; sell some SaaS software assets facing disruption risk; redeem funds from underperforming hedge funds. And these hedge funds, to meet redemptions, must sell assets. Asset prices fall, confidence is eroded, margin availability tightens, triggering more passive selling elsewhere. These effects propagate layer by layer and amplify in the financial markets.
What's worse, Trump chose Warsh. This is particularly problematic because he believes the current problem is too much money, when in fact, the opposite is true. As a result, since his selection, the pace of these market changes has significantly accelerated.
I have been trying to understand why memory chip manufacturers like DRAM / HBM / NAND (such as SNDK, MU) outperform other stocks by far. Of course, underlying product prices have indeed surged. But more importantly, these companies are now and in the near future in a state of excess profitability—although it is clear that their profitability is cyclical and will eventually fall back. As the cost of capital rises, the discount rate increases. The result is that assets with longer duration and speculative on future expectations will be hit, while assets with near-term cash flow will benefit relatively.
In such an environment, crypto assets naturally face a "doomsday scenario" as they are the frontline probes of liquidity condition changes. This is also why the market feels like it is "falling endlessly."
Highly speculative retail momentum stocks can hardly hold any gains, and even sectors where fundamentals are improving are struggling.
Due to demand for money exceeding supply, sovereign bonds and credit rates are both rising.
This is not a time to be comfortably extremely long. This is a phase that requires defense, extremely selective positions, and careful risk management. I'm not telling you to go all into cash, and this article is not a trading signal. You should take it as a kind of background framework to help you understand what's going on.
I personally sold my gold and silver at the peak, and currently, most of my position is in cash. I am not eager to buy anything. I believe that if you are patient enough, this year will present extremely rare opportunities.
Finally, thanks to the genius friends who thoroughly discussed these issues with me in the group chat, including @AlexCorrino, @chumbawamba22, @Wild_Randomness.
You may also like

IOSG: When Fintech Meets Crypto Native: The Next Decade of Digital Finance

They knew in advance that Trump would tweet about a ceasefire, entered with $20k, and exited with $400k.

The biggest bottleneck in DeFi development

CZ Memoir Released: Reveals a Large Amount of Industry Insider Information, Prompting Intense Rebuttal from Xu Mingxing

a16z: After securities are on the blockchain, why will intermediary institutions be replaced by code?

XRP Tokyo Is Here: What We Learn and What’s Next for XRP Price
Key Takeaways: Ripple’s 2025 XRP Tokyo event highlights a projected $33 trillion on-chain stablecoin volume by 2026. Significant…

Solana’s Future: Navigating the $285M Hack, Rug Pulls, and Milei Libra Scandal
Key Takeaways: Multiple Crises: Solana faces a $285 million hack, allegations of rug pulls, and the Milei Libra…

BTC USD Faces Tension: Markets React to Trump’s Dire Warning
Key Takeaways: Bitcoin’s price drops sharply below $70,000 amid geopolitical tensions, playing off Trump’s dramatic 8 PM ultimatum…

Bitcoin Price Surge: Ceasefire Sparks Optimism Hits $71K
Key Takeaways: After the US-Iran ceasefire announcement, Bitcoin surged beyond $71,000, marking its highest in a month. A…

Ethereum Price Forecast: Record $180 Billion Stablecoin Supply Marks Buyers’ Return
Key Takeaways: Ethereum’s stablecoin supply has surged to a record $180 billion, marking a 150% increase over the…

Emerging Evidence Links Argentina’s Milei to LIBRA Crypto Scandal
Key Takeaways: Evidence unveiled by Argentina’s federal prosecutors links President Javier Milei to the LIBRA token through call…

US Spot Bitcoin ETFs See Surge as BTC Nears $70K; LiquidChain and Layer-3 DeFi Rise
Key Takeaways: U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs absorbed $471 million in a single day, moving BTC closer to the…

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Decoupling from Tech Stocks, Shaped by Geopolitics and AI Turmoil
Key Takeaways: Bitcoin is decoupling from tech stocks as geopolitical tensions and AI crises reshape the market, currently…

Chaos Labs Departure Leaves Aave Without Risk Management Amidst Governance Conflict
Key Takeaways: Aave, with a $50 billion TVL, is currently operating without a risk manager due to Chaos…

Grayscale Ethereum ETF Staking: A New Catalyst for $5,700?
Key Takeaways: Grayscale’s Ethereum Staking ETF introduces a yield-bearing structure that could significantly reshape investor sentiment. Ethereum’s price…

Polygon Crypto Enhances Finality Through the Giugliano Hardfork
Key Takeaways: Polygon’s Giugliano hardfork is operational on the mainnet, effectively reducing transaction finality by 2 seconds. The…

Senate’s Three-Week Deadline: Ripple XRP and the CLARITY Act’s Critical Moment
Key Takeaways: The Senate Banking Committee’s decision on the CLARITY Act in late April could define XRP’s future…

Solana Foundation Introduces STRIDE for DeFi Security
Key Takeaways: STRIDE is a structured security evaluation program for Solana’s DeFi ecosystem, managed by Asymmetric Research. It…
IOSG: When Fintech Meets Crypto Native: The Next Decade of Digital Finance
They knew in advance that Trump would tweet about a ceasefire, entered with $20k, and exited with $400k.
The biggest bottleneck in DeFi development
CZ Memoir Released: Reveals a Large Amount of Industry Insider Information, Prompting Intense Rebuttal from Xu Mingxing
a16z: After securities are on the blockchain, why will intermediary institutions be replaced by code?
XRP Tokyo Is Here: What We Learn and What’s Next for XRP Price
Key Takeaways: Ripple’s 2025 XRP Tokyo event highlights a projected $33 trillion on-chain stablecoin volume by 2026. Significant…
