Delphi Digital's Latest Episode: Is Alt Season Already Here?

Original Title: The Hivemind - Alt Season is Already Here Original Authors: Kevin Kelly, Jose Maria Macedo, Yan Liberman, Ceteris, Jason Pagoulatos Compiled by: Rhythm BlockBeats

Editor’s Note: In the past few weeks, discussions in the crypto market have shifted from "How much higher can Bitcoin go?" to "Has alt season begun?" After a round of increases, BTC has entered a period of consolidation, while assets like ZEC, HYPE, and Lighter continue to strengthen. On-chain trading and speculative activities on Robinhood Chain and Solana have also rapidly heated up. Traditionally, this is often interpreted as a signal of risk appetite spreading from BTC to altcoins. However, as the fact that "altcoins are starting to outperform" becomes directly observable in the market, a deeper question arises: behind this round of increases, is new capital entering the crypto market, or is existing capital being redistributed more aggressively?

In the latest episode of Delphi Digital's "The Hivemind," the discussion directly addresses this question. Participants Kevin Kelly, Jose Maria Macedo, Yan Liberman, Ceteris, and Jason Pagoulatos discuss the current so-called "Alt Season" from the perspectives of macroeconomic factors, on-chain capital flows, token fundamentals, and market structure.

In this discussion, what stands out from Delphi is the breakdown of the question "Is alt season here?" into a set of more fundamental structural issues: Where is the capital coming from? How is risk appetite transmitted? Which assets can truly capture new economic activities? And how far can altcoin markets go without comprehensive incremental liquidity?

First, alt season is shifting from "broad Beta" to "structural Alpha." In the past, a typical alt season would usually spread from BTC, ETH, large-cap altcoins to small-cap assets, with the core driving force being the continuous influx of incremental liquidity into the market. However, the current market does not fully conform to this model: BTC, ETH, and SOL have not simultaneously experienced large-scale breakthroughs, yet capital is highly concentrated in a few strong assets like ZEC, HYPE, and Lighter, as well as high-volatility on-chain trading opportunities. This indicates that the current market is not characterized by "everything going up," but is closer to what Yan describes as an "alt picker’s environment"—a selective coin market. As unified liquidity Beta weakens, income, fees, token emissions, and value capture mechanisms begin to differentiate assets.

Second, the recovery of on-chain risk appetite does not equate to the entire crypto market welcoming new capital. In the past, a key criterion for judging whether a bull market is expanding was whether external capital continued to flow in. However, Jose's assessment of the current market is more cautious: many buy orders may simply be crypto investors who previously exited the market returning, rather than genuinely new capital. Meanwhile, products like FOMO and Robinhood Chain have indeed started to reach users who previously did not belong to the traditional Crypto Twitter circle. Both phenomena can coexist—there may be new users in the local market, but the entire asset class has not yet formed a sufficiently clear trend of incremental capital. Therefore, whether BTC, ETH, and SOL can expand again becomes an important verification condition for judging whether this round of market activity is a "rotation" or an "expansion."

Third, tokenization and on-chain stocks are changing the way risk appetite is carried. In the past, most applications in the crypto market revolved around native tokens, with assets, liquidity, and trading demand highly self-circulating. The recent emergence of on-chain stocks and their derivative plays on Robinhood Chain and Solana has more clearly brought assets with off-chain economic value, such as stocks, into the crypto-native trading system for the first time. In the short term, this still contains a lot of meme, leverage, and speculative mechanisms; but in the longer term, the change lies in that on-chain applications can begin to build new trading, revenue, and social products around traditional assets. What is truly worth observing is not how long a certain play can last, but whether on-chain finance is beginning to shift from "trading crypto assets" to "using crypto infrastructure to trade all assets."

Fourth, "narrative benefits" and "value capture" are being redefined. The development of RWA, tokenization, and on-chain stocks theoretically benefits the entire public chain ecosystem, but Delphi does not believe that value will flow evenly to all underlying assets. On the contrary, who can directly obtain transaction fees, stable income, and continuous buy orders may be more important than "which chain this trend occurs on." For this reason, when discussing assets like ETH and HYPE, the real comparison is not which narrative is more grand, but who can convert new activities into quantifiable economic value. This change essentially represents a migration of the altcoin market from purely trading stories to trading cash flows and supply-demand structures.

If this discussion can be compressed into one judgment, it is: altcoin markets have already occurred, but a truly comprehensive Alt Season still requires new capital and broader risk diffusion to prove.

In this sense, the subjects of this article are no longer just "the next altcoin that will rise," but rather the crypto market is forming a new capital structure: when broad-based liquidity is no longer the only driving force, the differentiation between assets, the ability to capture value, and where the next buyer comes from will be more important than the label "alt season" itself.

TL;DR

The current "alt season" is closer to a structural market rather than a comprehensive rally; fundamentally, capital is shifting from unified Beta to a few strong assets and specific tracks.

Altcoins outperforming does not equate to new capital entering on a large scale; fundamentally, it is still necessary to distinguish between external capital inflows and internal rotations within the crypto market.

BTC, ETH, and SOL have not simultaneously broken through, indicating that while risk appetite has spread, it is still insufficient to prove that the market has entered a phase driven by comprehensive liquidity.

The current market resembles an alt picker’s market, where asset performance differences are increasingly determined by income, fees, token emissions, and value capture mechanisms.

On-chain stocks and tokenization signify not just the addition of a new asset, but fundamentally that crypto infrastructure is beginning to shift from "trading crypto assets" to "carrying more traditional asset trading."

RWA and tokenization will not benefit all public chains and tokens equally; what truly determines valuation elasticity is who can convert new activities into sustainable income and real buy orders.

Whether this round of market activity can upgrade from "rotation" to "comprehensive Alt Season" hinges not on how much altcoins have already risen, but on whether broader new capital and core assets will take over.

When broad-based liquidity is no longer the only driving force, the core question of the market shifts from "what to buy that will rise" to "who truly captures value and where the next buyer comes from."

One of the most typical examples is Robinhood Chain. Robinhood officially launched this network in July and has positioned Stock Tokens as one of its core assets. According to Robinhood's official statement, these Stock Tokens are issued by Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited and essentially represent tokenized debt securities, with the underlying assets collateralized on a 1:1 basis. However, holders do not acquire legal or beneficial ownership of the corresponding publicly listed companies.

This point is very important.

"Stocks on-chain" does not equate to "moving a physical stock certificate directly onto the blockchain." Investors gain exposure to the economic performance of the underlying stocks on-chain, rather than a traditional direct shareholder status.

From a trading perspective, this is already sufficient to open up a multitude of new portfolio strategies.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev stated on September 9 that Robinhood Chain had approximately 200 Stock Tokens at that time, available to qualified users in over 120 countries and regions. Data from The Block shows that as of September 4, the value of tokenized assets on Robinhood Chain had grown from $11.9 million on July 1 to $149.4 million, with about 77% coming from stock-related tokens.

Subsequently, familiar strategies from the crypto market quickly layered onto these assets.

During the program, Ceteris mentioned that some projects began pairing Meme Tokens with stock assets, establishing new trading structures between stocks, Meme coins, and liquidity pools; a new type of Launchpad has also emerged on Solana centered around stock assets and Meme Tokens.

This enthusiasm is not just narrative. On September 2, the token issuance platform Pons on Robinhood Chain saw daily fees reach approximately $5.95 million, with a trading volume of about $544 million that day, and nearly 25,000 tokens were created.

Ceteris believes that in the short term, these strategies still carry very obvious speculative and gambling attributes, but what is more noteworthy is not how long a particular Meme coin can rise, but that assets like stocks with off-chain fundamental value are beginning to truly become the underlying materials for on-chain applications.

Many past Crypto applications were highly "self-referential": crypto assets provided liquidity for crypto protocols, which were then traded by crypto users for new crypto assets.

On-chain stocks provide another path—developers can build trading, lending, yield, collateral, and social products around real-world assets. Therefore, Ceteris judges that even if the current Meme craze cools down quickly, "stocks on-chain" itself may still be an important direction for the next one to two years.

Does Tokenization Favor ETH? Delphi is More Concerned About Who Actually Receives the Revenue

This also raises another question: If Tokenization and RWA become important narratives in the next phase, does that mean ETH will naturally become the biggest beneficiary?

Delphi guests did not provide such a direct answer.

Ceteris believes that if the market continues to trade around currency depreciation and the expansion of on-chain assets, ETH indeed has the potential to regain the narrative of "on-chain currency." However, from a practical allocation perspective, he has not significantly increased his ETH position.

Jason's judgment goes further: even if Tokenization itself is beneficial for the entire on-chain ecosystem, the protocols that truly capture trading volume, fees, and liquidity may not necessarily be ETH itself.

For example, assets like HYPE and Lighter, which directly undertake trading activities, may exhibit higher performance elasticity and price Beta under the same RWA and Tokenization logic.

In other words, from an asset pricing perspective, "which chain a trend occurs on" and "who ultimately captures the economic value created by this trend" are two different questions.

This is also another layer of meaning behind the so-called "coin selection market."

When the entire market no longer relies on a unified liquidity wave to rise, investors begin to re-ask: Where does the income flow? Who receives the fees? Is there continuous token issuance? Has revenue formed a buyback or other value capture mechanism?

In such a market, a narrative can simultaneously benefit many projects, but the final price performance may be highly differentiated.

What to Watch Next is Not the "Altcoin Season Index," But New Buyers

Delphi guests remain overall positive about the market, but the risks they discussed at the end of the program actually reveal the most important verification conditions for this round of market.

First, it is the macro policy environment.

The program repeatedly mentioned the so-called debasement trade. This does not refer to the U.S. government formally announcing a push for dollar depreciation, but rather a trading narrative that links fiscal pressure, debt management, and liquidity support policies with scarce assets like gold and Bitcoin.

This background did not appear out of thin air. On August 19, the U.S. Treasury announced that it would raise the single transaction limit for liquidity support repurchases of 10 to 30-year Treasury bonds from $2 billion to at least $4 billion, effective September 9. Reuters subsequently reported that the related policy temporarily depressed long-end yields and the dollar, reinforcing the narrative of "debasement trade" for gold and Bitcoin.

Jason therefore believes that what could truly change the current risk appetite environment may not necessarily be a specific crypto-native event, but rather a sudden reversal of policy conditions. For example, if inflation continues to rise, forcing monetary policy to be tighter than market expectations, the background conditions that previously supported risk assets may change.

Yan provided a more specific judgment: if BTC continues to rise, but the market's expectations for further policy easing do not increase in tandem, he would become more cautious.

The logic is simple—higher asset prices raise the requirements for "the next buyer." If prices continue to rise without an explanation of where the new purchasing power comes from, the difficulty of continuing the market expansion will increase.

The second thing to observe is whether BTC, ETH, and SOL can take over.

If these core assets break through again while on-chain activity continues to grow, then the current local altcoin market is more likely to further upgrade into widespread capital inflows.

Conversely, if the market maintains a structure of "a few strong coins rising + high speculation on-chain assets exploding" for a long time, then the so-called altcoin season may still just be a highly concentrated stock game.

It is precisely for this reason that the most valuable judgment from this episode of Hivemind is not that "the altcoin season has arrived" itself. More accurately, the altcoin market has arrived, but whether a comprehensive bull market has come still needs new funds to prove.

And before the answer appears, this resembles a market where coin selection, rotation, and risk management occur simultaneously: finding the fastest rising assets is certainly important, but after prices have already risen significantly, who is still willing to continue buying, where the funds come from, and when to start realizing profits may be the real variables determining how far this round of market can go.

This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.